In such a war all the members act under a general authority, and all the rights and consequences of war attach to their condition.
Still, however, it is public war , because it is an external contention, by force, between some of the members of the two nations, authorised by the legitimate powers.
Justice Chase, more simply, stated: "Congress is empowered to declare a general war, or congress may wage a limited war; limited in place, in objects, and in time. Thus, at least in the 18 th and 19 th centuries, authorizations for the use of force were understood to be included within Congress's power to declare war and to have narrower legal consequences than declarations of war.
Declarations were reserved for general war against particular countries and empowered the President "to use the whole land and naval force of the United States" United Kingdom in , "to employ the militia, naval, and military forces of the United States" Mexico in , or "to use the entire land and naval forces of the United States" Spain in to prosecute the war.
Authorizations, in contrast, allowed the President to use the American navy against the vessels of France, the Bey of Tripoli, and the Dey of Algiers, or against piracy generally. In the modern era authorizations have sometimes been quite broad 78 ; and some have, arguably, been equivalent in scope to a declaration of war. But the domestic legal consequences that flow from such authorizations still are substantially more limited than those that would flow from a declaration of war. Both declarations of war and authorizations for the use of force have the effect of eliminating the time limits otherwise imposed on the President's use of the armed forces under the War Powers Resolution; and both may legitimate the killing of foreign officials that might otherwise be prohibited by the executive order on assassinations.
The capture of enemy combatants on the battlefield and their detention until hostilities have subsided is implied in an authorization to use ground forces, 79 just as it would be included in a formal declaration of war. But a declaration of war automatically brings into effect a number of statutes that confer special powers on the President and the Executive Branch, especially concerning measures that have domestic effect. A declaration, for instance, activates statutes that empower the President to interdict all trade with the enemy, order manufacturing plants to produce armaments and seize them if they refuse, control transportation systems in order to give the military priority use, and command communications systems to give priority to the military.
A declaration triggers the Alien Enemy Act, which gives the President substantial discretionary authority over nationals of an enemy state who are in the United States. It activates special authorities to use electronic surveillance for purposes of gathering foreign intelligence information without a court order under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
It automatically extends enlistments in the armed forces until the end of the war, can make the Coast Guard part of the Navy, gives the President substantial discretion over the appointment and reappointment of commanders, and allows the military priority use of the natural resources on the public lands and the continental shelf. An authorization for the use of force does not automatically trigger any of these standby statutory authorities.
Some of them can come into effect if a state of war in fact comes into being after an authorization for the use of force is enacted; and the great majority of them, including many of the most sweeping ones, can be activated if the President chooses to issue a proclamation of a national emergency.
But an authorization for the use of force, in itself and in contrast to a declaration of war, does not trigger any of these standby authorities.
On the other hand, the authorization to use force in response to the terrorist attacks of has been asserted as legal authority for executive actions in the domestic context, the validity of which remains unresolved.
The executive branch asserted that the authorization permits detention without trial of persons arrested in the United States on suspicion of Al Qaeda related terrorism, which it regarded as bolstered by the Supreme Court's Hamdi decision finding the detention of enemy combatants captured in Afghanistan to be authorized as "a fundamental incident of waging war.
The following subsections give an overview of some of the more salient domestic legal consequences of a declaration of war or authorization for the use of force. Both a declaration of war and an authorization for the use of force have significant implications with respect to the War Powers Resolution WPR.
To that end the WPR mandates that the President consult with the Congress "in every possible instance" prior to introducing U.
Section 4 a of the WPR further requires the President, "in the absence of a declaration of war," to report to Congress within 48 hours in any case in which United States Armed Forces are introduced—. Section 5 b of the Resolution, in turn, requires that if a report has been submitted or was required to be submitted under Section 4 a 1 above, the President shall terminate the involvement of U. Thus, congressional enactment of either a declaration of war or an authorization for the use of force pursuant to Section 5 b has the effect of tolling the day withdrawal mandate of the WPR.
Each of the last three authorizations for the use of force enacted—the Gulf War authorization, the September 18, , authorization with respect to terrorist attacks, and the October 16, , authorization with respect to Iraq—have explicitly stated that they constitute the authorization required by Section 5 b of the WPR.
Each, in other words, has tolled the day limitation that the WPR otherwise would impose on the use of military force by the President. All three authorizations have further specified that "[n]othing in this resolution supersedes any requirement of the War Powers Resolution.
TWEA comes into effect upon a declaration of war or the existence of a state of war, while IEEPA is triggered solely by a presidential declaration of national emergency. Neither statute is triggered by an authorization for the use of force unless, in the case of TWEA, the authorization eventually leads to the existence of a state of war.
IEEPA is the authority most commonly invoked to freeze or block the assets of foreign states, companies, or individuals located within the jurisdiction of the United States. Until the broad range of economic authorities granted by TWEA could be exercised both in times of war and in times of national emergency.
However, in Congress limited the prospective application of TWEA to times of declared or undeclared war only and enacted IEEPA to apply during times of a national emergency declared by the President. A investigate, regulate, or prohibit, any transactions in foreign exchange, transfers of credit or payments or payments between, by, through, or to any banking institution, and the importing, exporting, hoarding, melting, or earmarking of gold or silver coin or bullion, currency or securities, and.
B investigate, regulate, direct and compel, nullify, void, prevent or prohibit, any acquisition, holding, withholding, use, transfer, withdrawal, transportation, importation or exportation of, or dealing in, or exercising any right, power, privilege with respect to, or transactions involving, any property in which any foreign country or a national thereof has any interest, by any person, or with respect to any property, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States; and any property or interest of any foreign country or national thereof shall vest, when, as, and upon the terms, directed by the President, in such agency or person as may be designated from time to time by the President, and upon such terms and conditions as the President may prescribe such interest or property shall be held, used, administered, liquidated, sold, or otherwise dealt with in the interest of and for the benefit of the United States Thus, TWEA is not dependent upon a declaration of war, but it can be triggered by such a declaration.
Neither appears to be triggered by an authorization for the use of force, unless and until, in the case of TWEA, a state of war actually develops. As noted, a declaration of war gives the President full authority over trade relations with the enemy. Other statutes triggered by a declaration give the President the authority to order plants to convert to the production of armaments and to seize those that refuse to do so, 93 to take control of the Tennessee Valley Authority in order to manufacture explosives or for other military purposes, 94 to assume control of transportation systems for military purposes, 95 to condemn land for military uses, 96 to have the right of first refusal over natural resources, 97 and to take control of communications facilities.
First enacted in , the Alien Enemy Act broadly authorizes the President to deport, detain, or otherwise condition the stay of alien enemies in the U. Given this premise, the Supreme Court has observed that "[e]xecutive power over enemy aliens, undelayed and unhampered by litigation, has been deemed, throughout our history, essential to war-time security.
The President must publicly proclaim the event that gives rise to activation of the act and make regulations regarding the treatment of those aliens.
But once he does so, his power to "apprehend, restrain, secure, and remove" enemy aliens extends to all "natives, citizens, denizens, or subjects of the hostile nation or government, being of the age of fourteen years and upward, who shall be in the United States and not actually naturalized.
Roosevelt authorized similar restrictions during World War II and, additionally, set up over community hearing boards to make internment recommendations to the Attorney General. The procedural rights of aliens who are subject to the Alien Enemy Act are drastically restricted compared with those that aliens otherwise enjoy, including hearing rights under the removal provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
Generally, however, the power of the President to control alien enemies under the act is extraordinary. As noted, the act does not appear to be triggered solely by an authorization for the use of force. There are a number of civilian federal criminal law provisions that apply explicitly to specified conduct in time of war.
They do not appear to distinguish between circumstances involving a declaration of war and other situations in which a state of war may exist absent a declaration of war, although courts and Congress have in some cases construed "time of war" or "at war" to require a formal declaration by Congress. Thus, these statutes may be triggered by a declaration of war, but they also may apply in circumstances where a state of war is deemed to exist.
Consequently, these criminal prohibitions do not appear to be triggered by an authorization for the use of force, unless and until a state of war develops. These statutes include, for example: Section willful secreting, mutilating, obliterating or destroying records of a war contractor, that is, a holder of a prime or subcontract connected with or related to the prosecution of a war ;. Section procuring the escape of a prisoner of war held by the United States or any of its allies or the escape of an apprehended or interned enemy alien held by the United States or its allies; aiding or assisting such escape or assisting the prisoner of war or enemy alien after his escape; or attempting or conspiring to do any of the above ;.
Section harboring or concealing persons known or believed to have committed or to be about to commit an offense under 18 U. Section gathering, transmitting or losing information related to the national defense with the intent or reason to believe that it is to be used to the injury of the United States or to the benefit of a foreign nation.
Includes, among other things, such actions with respect to information on any place in which any vessel, aircraft, arms, munitions, or other materials or instruments for use in time of war are being prepared, repaired, stored, or are the subject of research or development; or with respect to any prohibited place so designated by the President by proclamation in time or war or in case of national emergency in which anything for the use of the Army, Navy, or Air Force is being prepared, constructed, or stored ;.
Section gathering or delivering information relating to the national defense with the intent or reason to believe that it is to be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of a foreign nation. Subsection b deals with recording, publishing, or communicating or attempting to elicit information regarding movements, numbers, condition or disposition of Armed Forces, ships, aircraft or war materials, with the intent that the information be communicated to the enemy in time of war.
It also covers communicating to the enemy in time of war information on plans or conduct of naval or military operations or defense measures. Section making a false statement, with intent to convey false or misleading information, about the death, injury, capture, or disappearance of a member of the Armed Forces of the United States during a war or armed conflict in which the United States is engaged ;.
Section aliens who are found and taken on the sea making war against the United States or engaging in piracy against U. Section when the United States is at war or when a national emergency has been declared, willful destruction of war material, war premises, or war utilities, with intent or reason to believe that such actions may injure, interfere with, or obstruct the United States or associate nations in their war or defense activities; and conspiracy to do so ;.
Section in times of war or national emergency, willfully producing defective war material, war premises, or war utilities with intent to injure, interfere with, or obstruct the war or defense activities of the United States or associate nations ;. Section and U. Constitution, Art. Constitution requires confession in open court or testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act to convict for treason ;.
Section seditious conspiracy to overthrow or destroy by force the Government of the United States or to levy war against the United States ;. Section willfully engaging in certain activities in time of war with intent to adversely affect armed forces of the United States or to obstruct enlistment or recruitment; conspiracy to do so; harboring a person knowing or having reason to believe that the person has engaged in such conduct ;.
Section recruiting soldiers or sailors within U. It should also be noted that other federal and state criminal law provisions, which do not draw distinctions between conduct in time of war and at other times, also apply during wartime. Section prohibits knowing development, stockpiling, acquisition, possession or retention of any biological agent, toxin, or delivery system for use as a weapon, or knowing assistance to a foreign state to do so.
Section , with certain exceptions, prohibits similar conduct with respect to chemical weapons. Section prohibits specific transactions or actions involving nuclear materials, while 42 U. Section deals with sabotage of nuclear facilities or fuel. Section a prohibits certain uses of weapons of mass destruction. Other explosives offenses are covered in 18 U.
Section Hostage-taking is addressed in 18 U. Section , while kidnapping is covered by 18 U. Section deals with murder or manslaughter of foreign officials, official guests, or internationally protected persons.
Section addresses the murder or attempted murder of federal officers and employees, including members of the uniformed services, while they are engaged in or on account of the performance of official duties. It also covers murder or attempted murder of any person assisting an officer or employee of the United States in the performance of those duties or on account of that assistance.
Statutes of limitations, which preclude prosecutions after a specific amount of time has lapsed typically five years , may also be affected during wartime. Section , extends the statute of limitations for the prosecution of certain crimes against the United States for five years beyond the termination of hostilities. Originally enacted during World War II, the Suspension Act previously extended the statute of limitations in relevant cases until three years after the end of hostilities only "when the United States is at war.
It continues to suspend the applicable statute of limitations for three years beyond the end of hostilities, and applies "when the United States is at war.
There are other criminal law provisions applicable to the military in the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U. Sections et seq. Some of these provisions apply specifically in times of war. These will be treated separately in the subsequent section of this report on " Military Personnel.
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act FISA , as amended, in pertinent part, authorizes electronic surveillance, physical searches, and the use of pen registers and trap and trace devices to gather foreign intelligence information and sets out the procedures and circumstances under which each of these investigative tools may be used.
Section , that:. Notwithstanding any other law, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for a period not to exceed fifteen calendar days following a declaration of war by the Congress. In the context of physical searches, 50 U. Section includes language similar to that in Section Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize physical searches without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for a period not to exceed 15 calendar days following a declaration of war by the Congress.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize the use of a pen register or trap and trace device without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for a period not to exceed 15 calendar days following a declaration of war by Congress. None of these provisions appears to be triggered by an authorization for the use of force or the existence of a state of war under any authority other than a congressional declaration of war.
In addition to the foregoing provisions, FISA has been amended to authorize the use of these investigative tools without a court order for foreign intelligence purposes in "emergency" circumstances as determined by the Attorney General. To do so the Attorney General must 1 find that an emergency exists, 2 determine that the factual basis for the issuance of an order to approve such surveillance, physical search, or pen register or trap and trace device also exists, 3 advise a judge of the U.
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court FISC that a decision to use the emergency authority has been made, and 4 apply to the FISC judge so notified for a court order as soon as practicable but no later than within 72 hours in the case of an electronic surveillance or physical search or 48 hours in the case of a pen register or trap and trace device. However, depending upon the circumstances involved, these emergency powers, or other provisions within FISA, might be utilized.
As noted in the foregoing discussion of criminal law, 18 U. Section makes it a crime to kill or attempt to kill a "foreign official, official guest, or internationally protected person. This criminal provision does not apply to the killing or attempted killing of an internationally protected person in his or her own country.
The United States courts may exercise jurisdiction over the killing or attempted killing of internationally protected persons in violation of 18 U. Section committed outside the United States where the victim is a representative, officer, employee or agent of the United States; where a perpetrator is a U.
In addition, Part 2. Part 2. The executive order does not define "assassination," nor does either the criminal statute or the executive order specifically address the applicability of the prohibition to an armed conflict in which the U.
However, in times of war, the targeting of an enemy's command and control structures may be regarded as strategically important, is lawful under international law, likely is not intended to be barred by E. Hence, a declaration of war, because it creates a state of war regardless of whether actual hostilities have occurred, arguably creates a situation where such an act is not prohibited by domestic law.
Less clear is the effect of an authorization for the use of force. Once a state of war comes into existence following such an authorization, then the legal situation appears to be the same as with a declaration. But prior to that development, the legal effect of an authorization for the use of force on the assassination ban appears somewhat ambiguous.
An executive order may be revoked by the President through another executive order. To the extent that an executive order is issued pursuant to authority granted by statute, Congress may repeal it or terminate the underlying statutory authority upon which it rests.
The assassination ban is part of an executive order issued by President Reagan in under both statutory and constitutional authority. The order does not indicate the nature of the authority underlying the assassination ban in particular. If one were to argue that a statutory basis for the ban exists, then one might contend that an authorization for a use of force would, by implication, modify the ban or repeal it with respect to the context in which the use of force was authorized.
Conversely, declarations of war or authorizations for the use of force do not appear to have any particular consequences for the broad authorities conferred by the Defense Production Act of DPA , as amended. The original act contained seven titles, four of which were rescinded in This title provides the President with the authority to require the priority performance of defense contracts and to allocate scarce critical and strategic materials essential to the national defense.
This authority may also be extended to support the military requirements of allied nations when such extension is in the U. Priority contract performance, especially as implemented with respect to industrial resources, is intended to ensure sources of supply and timely delivery of required items for defense purposes. During this operation, such items as computer and communications equipment, Global Positioning System receivers, chemical warfare protective clothing, and medical supplies were urgently required by both U.
More recently, DPA authority has been used to ensure timely delivery of critically needed items to support the deployment of U. Title I contains a section that prohibits the President from exercising his priorities and allocations authority unless he makes certain findings supporting the need for such action.
Additional sections provide the President with authority relating to the hoarding of designated materials, penalties for the violation of any provision of Title I, small business preferences, etc.
This title is used only in cases where domestic sources are required and domestic firms cannot, or will not, act on their own to meet a national defense production need. Because private firms may be reluctant to invest in production capabilities for a new material unless a near-term demand for the material is relatively certain, Title III authorizes the use of financial incentives to expand defense-related productive capacity of critical components, critical technology items, and industrial resources "essential to the national defense.
The authorities conferred in this title become broader in times of a national emergency declared by the President or Congress. This title includes various provisions with relevance to defense industrial preparedness. Examples include a Section , which authorizes the President to provide antitrust defenses to private firms participating in voluntary agreements aimed at solving production and distribution problems involving national defense preparedness; b Section , which establishes a National Defense Executive Reserve NDER composed of recognized experts from various segments of the private sector and government except full-time federal employees for training for possible employment in the federal government in the event of an emergency; and c Section , a provision popularly known as the "Exon-Florio Amendment," which authorizes the President to suspend or prohibit the acquisition, merger, or takeover of a domestic firm by a foreign firm if such action would threaten to impair national security.
Another domestic legal issue implicated by declarations of war and authorizations for the use of force is their effect, if any, on insurance contracts, particularly with respect to clauses that exclude coverage for "acts of war. However, even a declaration of war by Congress does not appear to have an authoritative effect upon the construction of material terms contained in private contracts.
Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, a jet was hijacked and destroyed by political dissidents in the Middle East. According to the Pan Am decision, when a court interprets an insurance policy excluding from coverage any injuries "caused by" a certain class of conditions, "the causation inquiry stops at the efficient physical cause of the loss; it does not trace events back to their metaphysical beginnings. This issue will not likely arise with respect to any future acts of terrorism on U.
In the aftermath of September 11, , Congress enacted the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act to ensure the availability of commercial insurance coverage for losses due to acts of terrorism. A number of provisions of the U. Code concern crimes under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the activation of the reserves, the role of the Coast Guard, tax benefits for military personnel, and disability and death as the result of combat duty.
None appear necessarily to require a declaration of war to be applicable, but a declaration can trigger their application. Several of these crimes either only occur or occur in aggravated form "in time of war. Rule 19 defines the expression "time of war," as follows:. For purpose [ sic ] of Parts IV and V of this manual. Thus, a congressional declaration is not indispensable to prosecutions of these crimes but can trigger their application. They do not appear to be triggered by an authorization for the use of force unless a state of war develops.
In the absence of a presidential or congressional declaration, military courts have applied a variety of pragmatic tests to determine whether a "time of war" existed in connection with specific offenses.
For some offenses, the statutes of limitations may be tolled in "time of war. Section f. The jurisdiction of the military expands during time of war. Prior to , the UCMJ permitted trial by court-martial of "persons serving with or accompanying an armed force in the field" in time of war 10 U.
When faced with the court-martial of civilians, courts interpreted the phrase "in time of war" to mean only during wars declared by Congress.
Section a 10 to extend military jurisdiction in "time of declared war or a contingency operation. In time of war or conditions of martial law, military commissions may provide a special venue for trying persons not otherwise subject to the UCMJ.
Code , permits the trial by military commission of "alien unprivileged enemy belligerents" suspected of committing violations against the law of war or "other offenses triable by military commission. The definition of "unprivileged enemy belligerent" is restricted to those who engaged in or substantially supported hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners, except that those who were members of Al Qaeda at the time of the offense need not have such a connection to hostilities.
Chapter of title 10 of the United States Code 10 U. The authority conferred under Sections through can be exercised without a congressional declaration of war or national emergency; but those sections only allow reserve forces to be called to active duty for fixed statutory periods i. By contrast, the authority conferred under Section can be exercised "[i]n time of war or of national emergency declared by Congress" and allows reserve forces to be called to active duty "for the duration of the war or national emergency and for six months thereafter.
While the Retired Reserve can be called to active service for up to 12 months under 10 U. Section , it can be called to service "for the duration" under the authority conferred by Section see Section So-called "stop loss" authority is conferred under Section This authority allows the President, whenever persons are called to active service under Sections , , or , to "suspend any provision of law relating to promotion, retirement, or separation" with respect to any member of the armed forces who the President determines is essential to the national security of the United States.
This means that, when persons have been called to active service under the authority conferred by Section "for the duration" of a war or national emergency declared by Congress, otherwise applicable rules concerning promotions, retirements, and separations may not apply. Moreover, under Section a, the "period of active service" of any servicemember is extended to six months beyond the duration of any war in which the United States is engaged, unless the Secretary concerned terminates the period at an earlier date.
Thus, for all of these sections, a declaration of war is not a necessary predicate, but it can trigger the application of Section and related provisions.
Section 3 of title 14 of the United States Code specifies that "[u]pon the declaration of war if Congress so directs in the declaration or when the President directs, the Coast Guard shall operate as a service in the Navy There are several provisions of the Internal Revenue Code which apply to taxpayers involved directly or indirectly with war. A congressional declaration of war is not needed to render any of these provisions applicable.
Perhaps the most significant relevant provision of the Internal Revenue Code is Section under which some or all of the pay received by members of the uniformed services for active service in a combat zone is excluded from gross income i.
The same exemption applies to military pay received by service members hospitalized due to injuries sustained while serving in a combat zone, subject to a two-year limitation. The term "combat zone" is specially defined for purposes of this rule and means an area so designated by the President of the United States in an Executive Order, and such an Executive Order must be issued to make the tax exemption apply.
No reference is made in this provision to any declaration by Congress of the existence of a state of war and, by its express terms, it applied to service in the Korean and Vietnam conflicts. Qualified military benefits are exempt from tax under IRC Section , and these include bonus payments made by a state or its political subdivision to a current or former member of the Armed Forces, or to his or her dependents, by reason of service in a combat zone designated under Section Due dates for filing returns and for paying taxes, according to IRC Section , are deferred for members of the uniformed services serving in a combat zone designated by the President for purposes of IRC Section An exemption from federal income tax for the current taxable year and any prior taxable year ending on or after the first day of service in a combat zone and the preceding taxable year is allowed under IRC Section for a member of the Armed Forces who dies in a combat zone designated under IRC Section or who dies as a result of wounds, disease, or injury suffered in such a combat zone.
In addition, any unpaid taxes owed at the time of death will be forgiven. On the other hand, such a declaration would obviously assure that the particular period of hostilities in question is indeed a period of war. Some other veterans' benefits depend on whether the person seeking benefits served during a period of war.
Chapter 13 of title 38 of the United States Code 38 U. Compensation in connection with such deaths is accorded without regard to whether or not they occurred during or as a result of a war declared by Congress.
Rules under 38 U. Section relating to the eligibility of members of the Armed Forces who die while on active duty to be buried in national cemeteries including Arlington National Cemetery and other rules concerning burial benefits are not contingent on a congressional declaration of war. Under ordinary circumstances the President exercises the powers conferred on him by the Constitution and by statutes enacted by Congress.
As noted in the preceding section, in extraordinary circumstances a number of additional statutory powers may become available; and his Constitutional powers are likely to be given a generous interpretation by the courts. The standby statutory authorities potentially available to the President and the executive branch number in the hundreds. Some are triggered by a declaration of war, some by the existence of a state of war and, thus, also by a declaration of war , and some pursuant to a declaration or the existence of national emergency.
Most can be triggered by one or more of the foregoing circumstances. None of these special authorities appears to be triggered by an authorization for the use of force unless and until it leads to a state of war.
With respect to those statutes that are triggered by the existence of a national emergency or of a state or time of war, the determination of whether such a condition exists would be made in the first instance by the executive branch, unless the statute provides otherwise. Those authorities that require a declaration of national emergency as a predicate for coming into effect are not automatically activated by such a declaration.
National emergency powers can be exercised only pursuant to the strictures of the National Emergencies Act. The following subsections identify the standby authorities that become available to the President and the executive branch upon 1 a declaration of war, 2 the existence of a state of war, and 3 pursuant to a declaration of national emergency.
The latter statutes are listed separately because they can come into effect even if a declaration of war is never adopted. Within each subsection, the statutes are listed generally in the order in which they appear in the U. The lists exclude the statutes detailed above concerning criminal law and taxes as well as the disaster relief authorities contained in the "Robert T. Many of following provisions can be triggered by circumstances other than a declaration of war.
But all would come into effect upon enactment of a declaration of war:. Lanham, Md. Fowler, Linda L. Lee, pages — Oxford University Press, Howell, William G. Princeton: Princeton University Press, Katzmann, Robert A. Kriner, Douglas L. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Torreon, Barbara Salazar. Weed, Matthew C. Zeisberg, Mariah. Herndon, 15 Feb.
Knopf, : Kurland and Ralph Lerner, eds. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, Inc. See also, Fisher, Presidential War Power : 6. Lawrence: University of Kansas, : — Eric Schickler and Frances E.
They have justified their actions on the basis of executive responsibilities they find inherent in the Constitution. He has invoked that vague prerogative on numerous occasions to satisfy much larger objectives of the executive branch. Donald C. Howell and Jon C. James A. Thurber Lanham, Md. Elsea and Matthew C. Blechman and Stephen S. Kaplan, Force without War: U. In the early days of the United States, the understanding was that the president could order the military to defend the country against an attack, but that any sustained military action would require congressional approval.
It didn't take long before Congress and the president would clash over war powers. In , President James Polk ordered the U. Congress ultimately granted Polk an official declaration of war, allowing for sustained military action. Even President Abraham Lincoln , a passionate defender of congressional war powers when he served in the House of Representatives, took liberties when taking his first military actions of the Civil War.
While Congress was in recess in , Lincoln issued proclamations to assemble Northern state militias and initiate a blockade of the South. With public sentiment against the War in Vietnam, Congress passed the War Powers Resolution of to rein in presidential misuses of military power.
0コメント