As notices go, they tend to be pretty complete. Anil Potti , the former Duke cancer researcher who has now retracted or corrected 18 papers amidst investigations into his work, is now working at a Grand Forks, North Dakota, cancer center.
Skip to content. Anil Potti, via Duke Following five years of scrutiny, more than ten retractions , multiple settled lawsuits , and medical board reprimands , we may finally have some resolution on the case of Anil Potti, the once-rising cancer research star who resigned from Duke in Instead, we were confused.
Page 1 Page 2 … Page 4 Next page. Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. Insiders say the Perez memo and supporting materials published here would have been relevant to the efforts of the IOM committee not because of what they say about the behavior of a specific person, but because they provide important insights about the institutional oversight process at Duke. A detailed timeline of the Duke genomics scandal, which shows how the Perez incident alters what was previously known, appears here.
Perez, who is currently a resident at Duke, said the controversy he triggered had caused him to repeat his third year of medical school. I chose to take an additional year to complete medical school in order to have a more successful research experience.
My decision to stay at Duke was based on it being the best opportunity both personally and professionally. Thomas Henson, an attorney who represents the patients who are suing Duke, declined to comment.
Every day. But he paid the price. At the time he joined the Potti lab, Perez surely considered himself fortunate. In , Potti et al. Another Potti paper, published in the New England Journal of Medicine , proposed using genomics to assign early-stage lung cancer patients to treatment regimens. In both cases, the reported scales of improvements were dramatic.
Responding in Nature Medicine, Nevins and Potti partly acknowledged the criticism , but argued that their findings still stand. Alerted by the correspondence in Nature Medicine, the reviewers had specific questions about a paper on which Perez was the first author. Perez was in better position than Baggerly, Coombes and Wang to assess what was going on.
He conducted his residency through a UND program in Fargo from to From to , he taught at UND, winning an award for humanism in medicine in , the year he left for Duke. Under the terms of the settlement, any research Potti conducts using federal funds in the next five years must be supervised.
News Renowned Grand Forks researcher generated 'false,' 'altered' data, federal agency says A federal agency said last week Dr. Written By: Wade Rupard am, Nov.
0コメント